Kubatana.net has been tracking the progress of the Domestic Violence Bill through Parliament.

All hell broke loose recently when Movement for Democratic Change, Member of Parliament, Timothy Mubawu stated that:

“It is against God’s principles that men and women are equal”.

He went on to say that the Domestic Violence Bill should address the proper dressing by women because:

“some of the dressing by women is too inviting”.

In reaction to his comments, the Women’s Coalition organised a protest march on Tuesday, 10th October. Apparently when the Women’s Coalition asked the police for permission to march, Inspector Mutizira at Harare Central Police Station asked members of the Women’s Coalition why they wanted to “litter the streets” with their demonstration.

Meanwhile, after Kubatana.net published Timothy Mubawu’s comments and news of the Protest March one of our subscribers wrote to us and said:

Women naturally are trouble causers and I find it difficult why they want to hide behind their fingers. Women go arround sleeping with their garden boys and who is writing laws to protect the innocent men who is not going to deliver enough love to his wife after servicing the offlayer with sexual greed. Give a woman a lift in your car and start seeing the video of enticing you.Yes, you might ague that men use money to lure women but the bottom line is that the fish goes willingly for the worm, thus we shud not backtrack and allow women to yoke us when we work very hard for them to have a decent living.

Camfed alerted us to an anonymous advertisement placed in the state-controlled Sunday Mail newspaper on the 8th October 2006. The advertisement reads:

Plea to Honourable Members of Parliament and Senators
The passage of the domestic violence bill can make or break marriage as an institution in Zimbabwe. Do not rush it. Take it to the people. Present it to them in their own languages. And let them decide for thmeselves in a referendum because its their future and heritage. Do not let western influence kill our culture!

The person or organisation that placed this advertisement didn’t have the courage to identify themselves, preferring to sign themselves, Proudly Zimbabwean.

In South Africa’s Mail & Guardian newspaper, Jeremy Cronin (South Africa Communist Party deputy secretary general) poses the question:”At what point does a black multimillionaire cease to be historically disadvantaged?”

Kubatana.net recently received a press release from the United States Embassy in Harare containing information on Electronic Visa Application Forms (EVAFs). Please click here to read the text of the press release.

And we got this response from one of our subscribers:

The long and the short of it is that the US Embassy now requires all people wishing to travel to the US to complete an EVAF online. They say that hand written applications will no longer be accepted. They claim that this will “speed up and simplify” the US visa application process. And that the new system will “improve efficiency and customer service.”

Doubtless, it has the potential to do exactly that. For those foreign citizens who have access to a computer and the internet, with a connection speed that doesn’t time out at some point as they fill in the application’s 41 questions, that has Adobe Acrobat reader installed, and which is attached to a laser or ink jet printer.

For them, the new requirements will certainly speed up the process.

But how many Zimbabweans have access to all of this technology? How many Zimbabweans know how to use the Internet, much less fill in an online form? With Tel-One’s non-payment of its debts, how many Zimbabwean ISPs are still even able to dial up? How long does the average connection stay on line before it times out and you have to start again?

And what about all of those citizens in other countries that are even less technologically advanced than Zimbabwe?

Emma Lazarus’ poem “The New Colossus” is engraved on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty, the iconic symbol of America’s status as a nation of immigrants, a safe haven for the persecuted and prosperous alike. It says, in part:

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

Are the “wretched refuse” supposed to stop by the Internet cafe en route to the Embassy? It’s one thing to introduce a new procedure to make the process more efficient for those for whom it’s relevant, useful, or indeed easier. It’s another thing to require it for everyone, full knowing that Internet access, and skill, are not universally available.

Not that the new requirements mark a radical change in the US visa policies that have developed over the past fifty years. The American government already has a legion of restrictions to hold back the rising tide of “huddled masses.” Applicants are required to prove “sufficient funds” and “compelling social and economic ties” in their home country, not to mention a USD 100 processing fee – forfeited whether you get your visa or not. These are all powerful measures which already limit the number of visa applications the US government has to process each year. Quotas further restrict the number of visas that can be granted to citizens from any given country. And it’s an open secret that the quotas are lower for poorer countries than for wealthier ones.

The introduction of the EVAF might well be just another tactic in pre-selecting the “type” of person who is an acceptable visitor to the United States.

Maybe it’s time to scrub off the pedestal on the Statue of Liberty. And rewrite it.

Give me your wealthy, your comfortable,
Your educated elite yearning to spend money,
The select technocrats who can fill out our forms.
Send these, the privileged, fortunate few to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!