The MDC has announced that it will contest in the presidential run off. This will relieve many of our Kubatana subscribers, who have been adamant that they contest.

Last week, when the MDC was still debating whether to participate in a run off, we sent our subscribers this text message:

Kubatana! Runoff date not yet set. ZLHR say date should be on or b4 May 24. MDC says will decide to contest or not once date set. What do u think MDC should do?

The response was an overwhelming Participate. The vast majority of responses indicated that people thought the MDC should participate in a runoff. However, many also recognised the needs for improved conditions on the ground, so that the election would be democratic.

These are some of their submissions:

Participate to avoid giving the regime of ZPF a blank cheque. A serious political party should always remain relevant and workout counter strategies to remain popular.

–

MDC must contest coz it will beat ZPF hands down. People are angry with ZPF and will b angrier with the MDC if it boycotts. MDC will have betrayed the masses.

–

MDC should contest the election but should demand UN observer to be posted in all parts of the country

–

Morgi should participate in e run off. We’re more than ready-agitated rather-to dispatch old man to political dustbin. Violence wont change our vote and choice

–

I think MDC must be a principled party. Deciding to contest is out of question. Are they accepting the results? If yes then they are very confused!

–

MDC should do what must be done not what they feel like doing. The electorate has had enough of Tsvangirai threatening to pull out of election he has no right whatsoever to decide anything he must go on with the contest

–

Should contest when international Observers come in to observe

–

MDC must stop globe-trotting & begin to vigorously campaign. They’ve to contest the run-off

–

MDC should insist on a level playing field. If the conditions are not right it is pointless to participate

–

MDC shld stop the outdated game of shifting goalposts. It shld participate even tho the playing field is not even. By not participating it wld have betrayed e revolution

–

MDC should take part on 2 conditions: no voters roll, only IDs to be needed & international observers a must

–

MDC should contest in the run off because MDC will give Bob automatic victory & they would have betrayed the people

In recent discussions with several colleagues, we floated the idea of organizing a conference in Harare on sexualities. I would emphasize the full stop. Not reproductive and sexual health. Not HIV/AIDS, gender, and sexuality. Not violence against women and sexuality. Those are topics worthy of attention as well as a conference. Yet, conversations have had a slightly different focus, more an interest in exploring sexuality itself by examining, for example: How Zimbabweans understand and negotiate their own sexual selves. The rich histories of sexual practices and meanings in Zimbabwe. The ways discourses around sexuality make their way into projects of nation-building. The blending of Western and African ideas and categories in expressions of sexual rights and sexual liberation. Such a conference would continue to open up discussions about sexualities. Additionally, a meeting of the minds might lend insights into the ways sexuality relates to how day-to-day life happens, and is interwoven into economic, political, and social issues informing advocacy and challenges to the status quo.

The play Loupe, by Mandisi Gobodi, which ran during HIFA, is a good example of the ways sexuality can be an entry point to examine the landscapes and dynamics of the environments we live in. Or in this case a loupe, which is a type of magnifying glass. In the play, two brothers are at odds. One brother (Kilem) is a party commissar; he’s a comrade who likes beer, women, and power. Kilem’s younger brother (Sizwe) reveals he’s gay. In part, the play is about family bonds, while portraying a possible reaction to a family member acknowledging same-sex attraction. But the play is much, much more than a play with a “homosexual” theme. To a degree, the fact that Sizwe wants an intimate relationship another man is irrelevant. The overarching message of the play could have worked if Kilem was reacting to Sizwe having any goal he (Kilem) perceived as wrong. The play astutely unpacks, through Kilem and through sexuality, a mindset that seems present in Zimbabwe, and all over the world. It’s a mind-set driven by the desire to hold extreme and forceful power over people, ideas, and behavior. To manipulate facts, diminish individual rights, and selectively control what is acceptable. All the while building a power base to pressure others to conform. It’s a mindset that might be described as masculine, but not necessarily practiced by men only.

Gobodi’s writing is nothing short of amazingly masterful, particularly in capturing the complicated nuances of life in Zimbabwe. The play is extremely well directed and produced. And the acting . . . the performances were so powerful that when I saw the young man who played Kilem wandering around HIFA I was scared of him. Scared of the ways desire for power is exerted. The play will live on beyond HIFA as the British Council is currently working out plans for another run. It’s a must see for anyone interested in the economic, political, and social dynamics of Zimbabwe.

Run-off. That is in the in-word. Confusion reigns as the people try to decide and dictate the verdict that fits their circumstances. That is to say what “they” say they voted for in the past election. Not just that, but also what they believe they deserve. And then what after THE election? What election? And then the people, the so-called masses, get the little pleasures from their already wretched existence after THE election. They know what they want. Feed the kids, send them to school. Have a job. Have access to ARVs. The other day a toothless grannie said: why this stubbornness? She should know. She is from that generation that hid the present oppressors from the other oppressors. And then what? No one knows anymore. A good man gone bad? Ask the Jesuits perhaps? A freedom fighter gone anonymous? Ask Twoboy? Once upon a time a “people person?” A toothless old man said: “Is this old man still in charge?” He spoke b’coz he knew. Questions. Questions. Questions. But when the old people start cursing, perhaps someone should pay attention.

I’m lucky enough to get copies of The Guardian Weekly, now and again. Unfortunately not on weekly basis but that’s ok. They’re given to me to read by a friend of a friend who subscribes. Reading the letters section of an old copy last night I came upon a letter that referred to Mugabe saying that he echoes the description of Macbeth towards the end of Shakespeare’s play:

“Now does he feel / His secret murders sticking on his hands / . . . / Those he commands move only in command, / Nothing in love; now does he feel his title / Hang loose about him, like a giant’s robe / Upon a dwarfish thief.”

The writer of the letter reminds us that Macbeth dies unloved by anyone, even by those who gave him “mouth-honour” and “curses not loud, but deep”.

Having finally gotten so fed up with my local banking hall because it never has power, is never online, seldom has cash and always allows the police and military to jump the queue, I called their public relations department. The guy I spoke with was charming and concerned and cheerfully told me told me that I was justified in complaining because my branch is rated second worst in the entire country. Top bad spot goes to their branch in Chivhu, I was told. When I raised the issue of our army and police bullies and said that his staff need some help in telling them to wait their turn, he said that when we come “eyeball to eyeball with a soldier we crumble into jelly’ . . . quite right I said, but What Are We Going To Do About It? I could visualise him sitting at his desk in Borrowdale slowly shaking his head, as I am mine.

The likes of the Bob arse licker, Caesar Zvayi, are particularly nauseating to the likes of me who receives and processes a vast amount of human rights information from all over Zimbabwe. The reports, photographs and documentaries that Kubatana.net has published bear witness to the post election brutality that Zanu PF is responsible for. As I write this I’ve just heard that injured MDC supporters taking shelter in a church in one of Harare’s high density areas have been rounded up and taken away by Mugabe’s police force. Zvayi accuses Biti and Tsvangarai of being shrill. Whilst he’s right that there isn’t “genocide” in Zimbabwe, there is, as the BBC described it, “electoral cleansing”. We are getting reports from all corners of Zimbabwe describing horrific cases of post election violence.

Zvayi, one of the state-controlled Herald newspaper’s most poisonous pens, goes on to say

What is more Zanu-PF has been on the ground since March 29 while the MDC-T leadership have been gallivanting on a purported “diplomatic offensive” which appears to have backfired spectacularly because, apart from Levy Mwanawasa who has apparently never recovered from that horrible accident that nearly claimed his life, no other sane African leader bought Tsvangirai’s wild claims.

Certainly Zanu-PF has been on the ground since March 29 beating peoples heads in; this is Zanu-PF’s tried and tested method of election (pre and post) campaigning.