Kubatana.net ~ an online community of Zimbabwean activists

In Zimbabwe women are pushed to the margins, pushed to the limit

TOP del.icio.us

When the year began, two women suffered miscarriages after they were beaten up by police in the border town of Beitbridge.

They were suspected of being prostitutes, apprehended and then they were assaulted to the extent of losing the pregnancies they were carrying.

Perhaps they were prostitutes, perhaps they were not but one thing is certain – when we live in a society that insists on pushing some of its members to the margins by discriminating and stigmatizing them – it is inevitable that we increase the vulnerability of such individuals.

Their exclusion and ostracism serves no purpose other than making them easy prey for those in position of power and who would not hesitate to abuse that power.

Yet for the greater part, there is a tacit approval of these violent acts because they affirm the prejudices of our society, they are premised on the moral judgments people make about women who prostitute themselves either through overt means by selling their bodies in return for money or those who covertly prostitute themselves by acquiescing to be the mistresses of married men for economic gain.

Addressing at a two-day regional conference hosted by SAfAIDS on a series “changing the river’s flow examining the HIV/Culture confluence”, Jason Wessenaar the Project Director of Siyazi Counselling and Testing Project made the very astute observation that while culture helps us to make sense of the world around us by giving people a sense of identity and belonging, it also governs human behaviour.

So our intolerances, our prejudices and our bigotry are a reflection of our cultural beliefs and our interpretation of what is appropriate and what is unacceptable conduct.

Remarking on the limitations of culture, he pointed out that, “culture is a tool that can be used to empower or exclude, exploit and control” members of a society.

What we cannot tolerate reflects what our deep-rooted convictions and beliefs are, yet using Wessener’s observation that culture is a lens we use to view the world, as a premise, how do we then know that what we perceive as reality is in fact so and not just a consequence of the lens we are using to view it?

We push women to the margins, increase their vulnerability, ostracize them and give them an “otherness” such that they have no choice but to engage in more risky behaviour – pushed to the limits, their desperation will drive them to the extremes.

Whilst we bemoan the prevalence of small houses, of women engaging in long term relationships with married men, of men having multiple concurrent sexual relations – we need to find out why and how women avail themselves to these relationships.

One lady remarked in response to my column, “No girl grows up dreaming of one day becoming a small house, not one. But I know there are many boys who grow up dreaming of one day having a small house.” So when one would seek to interrogate what happened to that girl, who never dreamed of becoming a small house? How did she get here? What are the circumstances and situations that led her down this path?

The thing with culture is that it makes us not think about our behaviour or attitudes, it makes us not examine our beliefs, we take them for granted, we take for granted that what we think, assume of life and our perceptions of reality is accurate, altruistic and infallible.

“Culture is a lens we use to understand other people we interact with, and this often leads to us judging, imposing, discriminating and labeling,” noted Wessener.

I submit that the girl who never to be a small house, an appendage like the rose on a man’s laurel – grew up and found that she couldn’t clothe her own back, couldn’t fill her stomach, couldn’t afford a roof on her head and had no prospects whatsoever.

So she decided to pawn herself off to any man who so much as asked, married or not – where did society fail her or did she fail herself?

Did all these small houses and prostitutes fail themselves?

I think not.

I think women who are empowered make choices that are not harmful to them or that impinge on their sense of dignity.

I identify lack, as the key reason why small houses exist, why prostituting oneself becomes an option for most women. Something other than payment of lip service needs to be done to empower women, to elevate their status and to work towards addressing the gender imbalances inherent in our culture.

Whatever else society may label these women – the truth is that we as a society are all diminished by their continued humiliation or coercion along sexual lines.

As we continue to push them to the margins, we increase their vulnerability, we increase their desperation and ultimately we push them to the limits and possible over the edge.

2 comments to “In Zimbabwe women are pushed to the margins, pushed to the limit”

  1. Comment by Natasha:

    Thanks for such splendid feedback from the conference, Delta. I am a big fan of your writing. Although your blog above touched on a much broader issue, I wish to zero down to the one always controversial issue of ‘small house’ you also touched upon. Myself and a group of academic friends are conducting a snap research into the existence of the small-house phenomenon, and it is still ongoing. The major advantage we have had is that, we personally know several women who fall under this societal classification, and a lot of the women have none of the above mentioned excuses. It has been particularly interesting to find that there are also ‘big small-houses’, i.e married women who have sustained relationships with married men or single men. Sometimes or even predominantly, these women can fend for themselves, but they are not satisfied emotionally or sexually in their marriages. Contrary to popular expectation, women are capable of cheating just as seriously as men, other schools of thought have said that they even make the best cheats because of the supposedly inherent female ability to multitask. Poverty is not necessarily the dominant cause. The need for attention, quest for sexual gratification and the belief that the spouse is an infidel are among the other key driving factors motivating women to be content with being somebody else’s small house. Some women have intimated the fact that they have simply fallen out of love with their partners, but stay put for the usual reasons -the kids and oh, the scandal of it! Religion also plays a role and oftentimes, the women feel wretched for wanting to be sexually involved with other men, but its a feeling they cannot help. Interestingly, the belief that the world has a few ‘good’ men holds supreme (even though ironically, such few good men have no problems being shared by a number of women). Define good as ‘emotionally sensitive and considerate, sexy or good looking, financially stable and with a future, provides much needed attention and spends time with one, and above all, is not physically or verbally abusive.” In short, the reasons are hugely private to each individual in that situation. Gabriel Garcia Marquez in Love in the time of Cholera (1985) makes what I think is an interesting but true observation about marriage that explains a lot:

    “… the very nature of matrimony; an absurd invention that could exist only by the infinite grace of God. … against all scientific reason for two people who hardly knew each other, with no ties at all between them, with different characters, different upbringings to suddenly find themselves committed to living together, to sleeping in the same bed, to sharing two destinies that perhaps were fated to go in opposite directions.”

    In his opinion, the problem with marriage was that it ends every night after making love, and it must be rebuilt every morning before breakfast, and that is often hard. Marquez’s controversial views on love and relationships have been understood to go as far as him claiming that only same sex relationships, especially between women work because its about understanding each other and a woman is better understood by another woman. What I know is unlike animals, humans cannot be expected to behave in a very predictable manner and the reasoning behind certain behaviors cannot be neatly classified under ‘because of’ or even justified.

  2. Comment by Delta:

    Hey Natasha!

    Thank you so much for this most interesting and provocative contribution. I suspect you and your friends will open a wonderfully wicked can of worms..lol!!! Our society is far from ready to swallow the bitter pill of reality that their ‘virtous’ women are adept and have adapted to the practise of playing the cheating game.
    I completely agree with you that the above reasons apply to just fraction of small houses whilst some definitely need nor outside factor to prompt them to cheat – they (like men) have a natural inclination towards multi-tasking in terms of sexual partners.
    And what a hilariously cynical view of the marital institution by Gabriel Garcia Marquez (I’ll confess, I hadn’t heard of him before but now the name is sure to stick) thanks so much for sharing that.
    It gives one more fodder material to ponder on as food for thought.