<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We want a legitimate and effective government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/we-want-a-legitimate-and-effective-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/we-want-a-legitimate-and-effective-government/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=we-want-a-legitimate-and-effective-government</link>
	<description>Kubatana.net speaks out from Zimbabwe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie Zvapera</title>
		<link>http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/we-want-a-legitimate-and-effective-government/#comment-181100</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Zvapera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/?p=1336#comment-181100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the following questions have to be asked to the NCA, firstly is there something inherently wrong, unconstitutional or what about the Kariba document or it is just the process that they are not happy with. If it is the process then submit the Kariba document to public scrutiny and move on to enacting the constitution. Secondly, does it mean that we cannot have a democratic constitution if the NCA is not driving the process? Who then will be doing the oversight role if the NCA has decided to sit in the driver&#039;s seat. I though the role of civic society is to provide checks and balances in society and hold the legislature to account by ensuring effective citizen participation through information dissemination and education.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the following questions have to be asked to the NCA, firstly is there something inherently wrong, unconstitutional or what about the Kariba document or it is just the process that they are not happy with. If it is the process then submit the Kariba document to public scrutiny and move on to enacting the constitution. Secondly, does it mean that we cannot have a democratic constitution if the NCA is not driving the process? Who then will be doing the oversight role if the NCA has decided to sit in the driver&#8217;s seat. I though the role of civic society is to provide checks and balances in society and hold the legislature to account by ensuring effective citizen participation through information dissemination and education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
