<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple channels of resistance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/multiple-channels-of-resistance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/multiple-channels-of-resistance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=multiple-channels-of-resistance</link>
	<description>Kubatana.net speaks out from Zimbabwe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/multiple-channels-of-resistance/#comment-86598</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/?p=519#comment-86598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shock answers the conundrum facing many groups about remaining non-partisan in a difficult environment. Some wait for the political lead, some ignore it, some cow tow to it, some hope for more coordination, respect as equals, or position in a coalition. What Shock is hinting at is asserting legitimate self-interest of different sectors and groups. If all come at the isue from their point of view, it becomes a kind of de facto coordination that builds in rough bubbling parallel. 

Example, a group may not wish to side with the MDC court application, but sympathizes with respecting rule of law. While all security attention is focused on blocking citizens from accessing the court where their case is heard, for example, is an opportunity to get out a message about respecting rule of law in multiple locations. Multiple channels of resistance at work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shock answers the conundrum facing many groups about remaining non-partisan in a difficult environment. Some wait for the political lead, some ignore it, some cow tow to it, some hope for more coordination, respect as equals, or position in a coalition. What Shock is hinting at is asserting legitimate self-interest of different sectors and groups. If all come at the isue from their point of view, it becomes a kind of de facto coordination that builds in rough bubbling parallel. </p>
<p>Example, a group may not wish to side with the MDC court application, but sympathizes with respecting rule of law. While all security attention is focused on blocking citizens from accessing the court where their case is heard, for example, is an opportunity to get out a message about respecting rule of law in multiple locations. Multiple channels of resistance at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
