<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A popular but largely ineffectual opposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/a-popular-but-largely-ineffectual-opposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/a-popular-but-largely-ineffectual-opposition/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-popular-but-largely-ineffectual-opposition</link>
	<description>Kubatana.net speaks out from Zimbabwe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/a-popular-but-largely-ineffectual-opposition/#comment-72511</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/?p=355#comment-72511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My reply to Maggie&#039;s request for feedback was this:

You say it yourself: He has remained (and wishes to remain) a loyal member of a party that &quot;thrives on patronage and corruption&quot;. What sort of a recommendation is that? Could he be &quot;clean&quot; simply because he hasn&#039;t been found out yet? So why should you vote for him? What does he stand for? What are his policies? If he is loyal to ZANU(PF) does he support its &quot;land reform programme&quot;? He has certainly never spoken out against it. And does he support the price controls that have destroyed business operations? He hasn&#039;t said. If he did win, how much of ZANU(PF) - policies and people - would he retain in government? We don&#039;t know.

You&#039;re guessing &quot;because of the person that he is&quot;. But is that enough? We don&#039;t really know what sort of a person he is as a candidate because we don&#039;t know where he stands on a myriad of issues.

You say: &quot;I urge you to pause and think soberly about the forthcoming elections and ask yourself, as things stand, who has the qualification to rule.&quot;

You might do that yourself. There is plenty of time yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My reply to Maggie&#8217;s request for feedback was this:</p>
<p>You say it yourself: He has remained (and wishes to remain) a loyal member of a party that &#8220;thrives on patronage and corruption&#8221;. What sort of a recommendation is that? Could he be &#8220;clean&#8221; simply because he hasn&#8217;t been found out yet? So why should you vote for him? What does he stand for? What are his policies? If he is loyal to ZANU(PF) does he support its &#8220;land reform programme&#8221;? He has certainly never spoken out against it. And does he support the price controls that have destroyed business operations? He hasn&#8217;t said. If he did win, how much of ZANU(PF) &#8211; policies and people &#8211; would he retain in government? We don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re guessing &#8220;because of the person that he is&#8221;. But is that enough? We don&#8217;t really know what sort of a person he is as a candidate because we don&#8217;t know where he stands on a myriad of issues.</p>
<p>You say: &#8220;I urge you to pause and think soberly about the forthcoming elections and ask yourself, as things stand, who has the qualification to rule.&#8221;</p>
<p>You might do that yourself. There is plenty of time yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
